For foundations and funders

Fund with confidence.
Strengthen without
replacing.

Capacity-building money is among the hardest spending to evaluate. Most funders cannot say, with evidence, whether a grantee is stronger than it was two years ago.

We assess organizations on a consistent instrument, surface institutional risk before it becomes a write-off, and remeasure so improvement is demonstrable rather than reported.

Start an institutional conversation How portfolio assessment works →
The capital–capacity problem

Money does not create institutional strength.

Capable local organizations stay underfunded — not because the work is weak, but because they cannot demonstrate readiness in the specific forms institutional funders require.

Funders face the mirror of that problem. They struggle to identify credible partners, compare capacity across a portfolio, price institutional risk, and determine whether capacity-building money changed anything at all.

Both sides are trying to answer the same question from opposite directions: is this organization ready? Almost nobody measures it consistently.

One system, two sides

The same infrastructure serves both.

Organizations and funders need different things from the same underlying measurement.

For organizations

  • 01
    Measure — find the constraint producing the others
  • 02
    Strengthen — fix it in sequence, not all at once
  • 03
    Qualify — close the gaps funders check
  • 04
    Implement — deliver with systems that hold
  • 05
    Prove — remeasure against your own baseline

For funders and partners

  • 01
    Discover — find organizations worth considering
  • 02
    Verify — assess capacity on one instrument
  • 03
    Invest — with institutional risk named up front
  • 04
    Monitor — track improvement, not just spend
  • 05
    Learn — know whether the capacity money worked
The questions we hear

What funders actually ask us.

What we do for institutions

A common instrument across a portfolio.

Assessing grantees one at a time, with different questions each time, produces impressions rather than comparison. A single instrument applied consistently produces a portfolio you can actually reason about.

What we will not tell you

We have no proprietary dataset and no benchmark library drawn from thousands of organizations, so we will not tell you how a grantee compares to the sector. What we have is a consistent instrument, senior practitioners who have run organizations at scale, and comparison against each organization’s own baseline over time.

Engagements begin as a scoped pilot — typically a small number of organizations — so you can judge the output before committing a portfolio to it.

How we work with grantees

Strengthening is not supervision.

An assessment commissioned by a funder and experienced by a grantee as an audit produces defensive answers and useless data. We are explicit with every organization about who commissioned the work, what will be shared, and what will not.

Organizations receive their own results. Capacity plans are built with them, not for them. And the goal is an organization that needs less from everyone — including us.